Simulating Influence Dynamics with LLM Agents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70777/si.v2i1.13971Keywords:
opinion dynamics, belief systems, llms, large language models, agi misinformation, agi propaganda, agi simulation, agi model, agi world model, social network analysisAbstract
This paper introduces a simulator designed for opinion dynamics researchers to model competing influences within social networks in the presence of LLM-based agents. By integrating established opinion dynamics principles with state-of-the-art LLMs, this tool enables the study of influence propagation and counter-misinformation strategies. The simulator is particularly valuable for researchers in social science, psychology, and operations research, allowing them to analyse societal phenomena without requiring extensive coding expertise. Additionally, the simulator will be openly available on GitHub, ensuring accessibility and adaptability for those who wish to extend its capabilities for their own research.
References
[Aher et al., 2023] Gati V Aher, Rosa I Arriaga, and
Adam Tauman Kalai. Using large language models to simulate
multiple humans and replicate human subject studies.
In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages
–371. PMLR, 2023.
[Carpentras, 2023] Dino Carpentras. Why we are failing at
connecting opinion dynamics to the empirical world. Review
of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 2023.
[Chen et al., 2024] Kai Chen, Zihao He, Jun Yan, Taiwei
Shi, and Kristina Lerman. How susceptible are large language
models to ideological manipulation? arXiv preprint
arXiv:2402.11725, 2024.
[Deffuant et al., 2002] Guillaume Deffuant, Fr´ed´eric Amblard,
G´erard Weisbuch, and Thierry Faure. How can extremism
prevail? a study based on the relative agreement
interaction model. Journal of artificial societies and social
simulation, 5(4), 2002.
[Ecker et al., 2022] Ullrich KH Ecker, Stephan
Lewandowsky, John Cook, Philipp Schmid, Lisa K
Fazio, Nadia Brashier, Panayiota Kendeou, Emily K
Vraga, and Michelle A Amazeen. The psychological
drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to
correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1):13–29,
[Flache et al., 2017] Andreas Flache, Michael M¨as, Thomas
Feliciani, Edmund Chattoe-Brown, Guillaume Deffuant,
Sylvie Huet, and Jan Lorenz. Models of social influence:
Towards the next frontiers. Jasss-The journal of artificial
societies and social simulation, 20(4):2, 2017.
[Friedkin and Johnsen, 2011] Noah E Friedkin and Eugene
C Johnsen. Social influence network theory: A sociological
examination of small group dynamics, volume 33.
Cambridge University Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4074/S2113520711012138
[Hegselmann and Krause, 2015] Rainer Hegselmann and
Ulrich Krause. Opinion dynamics under the influence
of radical groups, charismatic leaders, and other constant
signals: A simple unifying model. Networks and
Heterogeneous Media, 10(3):477–509, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/nhm.2015.10.477
[Horton, 2023] John J Horton. Large language models as
simulated economic agents: What can we learn from homo
silicus? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic
Research, 2023.
[Kandel, 1986] Denise B Kandel. Processes of peer influences
in adolescence. In Development as action in context:
Problem behavior and normal youth development, pages
–227. Springer, 1986.
[Kelman, 1958] Herbert C Kelman. Compliance, identification,
and internalization three processes of attitude change.
Journal of conflict resolution, 2(1):51–60, 1958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106
[Kelman, 1961] Herbert C Kelman. American association
for public opinion research. The Public Opinion Quarterly,
(1):57–78, 1961.
[Kudiabor, 2024] Helena Kudiabor. Virtual lab powered
by ‘AI scientists’ super-charges biomedical research
[preprint]. Nature, December 2024.
[Lan et al., 2024] Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu, LeiWang, Yang
Wang, Deheng Ye, Peilin Zhao, Ee-Peng Lim, Hui Xiong,
and Hao Wang. LLM-based agent society investigation:
Collaboration and confrontation in avalon gameplay. In
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods
in Natural Language Processing, pages 128–145, Miami,
Florida, USA, November 2024. Association for Computational
Linguistics.
[Leng and Yuan, 2023] Yan Leng and Yuan Yuan. Do
llm agents exhibit social behavior? arXiv preprint
arXiv:2312.15198, 2023.
[Mathias et al., 2016] Jean-Denis Mathias, Sylvie Huet, and
Guillaume Deffuant. Bounded confidence model with
fixed uncertainties and extremists: The opinions can keep
fluctuating indefinitely. Journal of Artificial Societies and
Social Simulation, 19(1):6, 2016.
[Nasim et al., 2022] Mehwish Nasim, Richard Stearne, and
Tim Legrand. A framework for modelling social influence
in a wargame setting, May 2022. Completion Report Submitted
to the Funding Agency.
[National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2015]
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Red team, 2015.
[OpenAI, 2023] OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. https:
//openai.com/research/gpt-4, 2023. Accessed: 2024-12-
[Papachristou and Yuan, 2024] Marios Papachristou and
Yuan Yuan. Network formation and dynamics among
multi-llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10659, 2024.
[Qu and Wang, 2024] Yao Qu and Jue Wang. Performance
and biases of large language models in public opinion simulation.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
(1):1–13, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14432471.2024.2396666
[Tan et al., 2024] Eugene Tan, Thomas Stemler, and Michael
Small. Cognitive dissonance and introversion effects on
opinion dynamics and echo chamber formation. Physica
A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2024.
[Tang et al., 2024] Jiakai Tang, Heyang Gao, Xuchen Pan,
Lei Wang, Haoran Tan, Dawei Gao, Yushuo Chen,
Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, Yaliang Li, et al. Gensim: A general
social simulation platform with large language model
based agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04360, 2024.
[Wang et al., 2024] Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng,
Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen,
Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, et al. A survey on large
language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of
Computer Science, 18(6):186345, 2024.
[Yu, 2024] Chen Yu. How will ai steal our elections? Center
for Open Science, 2024.
[Zhao et al., 2024] Andrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin
Xu, Matthieu Lin, Yong-Jin Liu, and Gao Huang. Expel:
Llm agents are experiential learners. In Proceedings of
the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38,
pages 19632–19642, 2024.
[Zucker, 1978] Harold Gene Zucker. The variable nature of
news media influence. Annals of the International Communication
Association, 2(1):225–240, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1978.11923728
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mehwish Nasim, Syed Muslim Gilani, Amin Qasmi, Usman Naseem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.